Daily Diary: David Runciman
Monday, February 01, 2010
In the US, though, the whole scheme seems awry. It is almost as if the poorer you are, the more likely you are to vote Republican, against your own interests in receiving free healthcare, for example. In his article, Runciman does a good job of explaining this inconsistency. It is all to do with the patronising effect that comes about when liberals try to help the disenfranchised:
The Republicans have learnt how to stoke up resentment against the patronising liberal elite, all those do-gooders who assume they know what poor people ought to be thinking.
This still does not seem to me to be quite enough to explain how deeply-rooted suspicion of Democratic government is in the US, such that even its positive actions - or what would appear to be so from a European vantage point - are seen as negative and oppressive by those they seek to help. But it's a good start.
Right-wing politics has become a vehicle for channelling this popular anger against intellectual snobs. The result is that many of America's poorest citizens have a deep emotional attachment to a party that serves the interests of its richest.
Labels: Barack Obama, Daily Diary, Republicanism



1 Comments:
I agree completely with your assessment. Also, the Republicans have been able to find certain highly emotional issues such as abortion, that make poor or middle class voters who are religious, who would have voted Democrat, instead vote for Republicans.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home